« Practice vs theory | Main | Balance »
Meanings and doings
July 19, 2005
In response to my post Recalibrating my sexuality a few days ago, I got some interesting responses – interesting because many of you have been echoing questions I have been asking myself. I’ll start with a big one, from sinboy:
I’m interested in finding out (if you want to share) what sex, being sexual, and having a sexuality means to you, where you see yourself now, and where you want to be, in terms of sex life, sexuality, and so on.
The answer to these questions is to be found by reading between the lines in the 360 plus posts on my blog. But I’m sure you don’t want to do that much work, so I’ll try to directly address what these things mean to and for me in my personal, not my professional sex life (that’s a slightly different story in some ways). At the moment I’m struggling with what exactly sex is and why it is compelling for me, and pondering the importance of partnered sex in my life. About a month ago I wrote a post called Sexual autonomy, about my struggles with my need/desire for partnered sex and my conscious work to prioritize my sexual needs by taking care of them myself. I’m not really sure what role I want partnered sex to take in my future – well, actually I do know what I want, but I think I have to start preparing myself for plan B and what happens if I don’t get what I want. This means that at my current impasse, I’m not entirely sure what being sexual means for me – being sexual for the last few years has been part of a quest for no-holds-barred fucking. I’m trying to rethink what that looks like at the moment and for the future. So that’s kind of where I’m seeing myself now: at a kind of crossroads, but not just any crossroads, an Amsterdam one, with six streets intersecting, bikes and cars and buses and trams and pedestrians coming from every angle. I have to look before I cross, pick a path because it looks interesting and has too many consonants and double a’s (oh wait, this isn’t a metaphor anymore). The point is, when I know what the hell I’m doing, I’ll let you know. And then I’ll change my mind again, and I’ll write about that too.
To me, having a sexuality is something that is really core to who I am. It’s not an entirely biologically determined or socially constructed thing. It’s fluid, it has different names, it will ebb and flow and change over my lifetime – it has already morphed many times. My sexuality, unlike the things I have, the people who stimulate me and even the useful body parts I have, is with me for always. It’s more mine than I think anything else can be; it’s a site for the exploration of who I am and what it means for me to be a person and exist in this world.
It sounds like you’re burned out on too much carnality and not enough love in your sex. For me, sex with people I’m not all that close with happens from time to time, but it’s the loving, or even just friendly sex that grounds me, and gives the fun, kinky, wild orgy sex a context. (another piece of sinboy’s comment)
The problem is that I don’t know that I can count on having loving sex any time soon – and I think it’s dangerous (or at least problematic) for me to be on the lookout for that. I’d love to have love in my sex, but I also want to be wary of imaging loving sex when that’s not what’s happening in reality. Also, the sex I was having at Jefferson’s orgies was friendly and grounding in many ways – I had multiple, months-long sexual relationships with people within the framework of the parties; I wasn’t even frequently fucking strangers there (for instance, I’ve been fucking Todd since November, and I would say that we are friends). Jefferson has created a small community of people who generally care for each other – but there are also somewhat harsh limits to the realities of those friendships. For instance, the awful sex accident Todd and I had – Todd is my friend, not my boyfriend, so in the moment and aftermath of the injury, he was free to do whatever, which included going to Jefferson’s orgy the night after I was injured. That didn’t entirely feel like a moment of betrayal – but it did sharply remind me of the limits of casual sex friendships.
This and the other things I mentioned in my post two days ago have led me to feel very conservative about my sexuality at the moment – conservative in that I’m being somewhat reticent with it, conserving my sexual energy, and resisting the pull of passions that may put me in a worse headspace (though I’m not all controlling of my passions, as it seems that my libido has withered to a great extent). I’m also feeling like I only want to share sexual energy with someone who isn’t going to sap it all up like a leech; I want some symbiosis. And furthermore, I’m not feeling like bestowing my awesomeness on most people right now. I don’t want to sound like I think I’m just the bee’s knees, but I do know a thing or two and I don’t want to share the power with just anyone. Have I fucked and smarted myself out of viable partners? Stay tuned for the answer… you might be waiting for a while.
At the risk of becoming a goddamned hippie, I think I need to separate sex and intimacy. I know it sounds like I’ve been doing that all along, and I have in some ways – but I think what I need to explore is the realm of non-genital contact. This means I could be on my way to becoming a bondage enthusiast, an erotic hypnotist or a cuddle party attendee! Well, maybe not, but we’ll see.
I’m stepping away from fucking partly because of the fear that I’ll never really get what I want on any ongoing basis. Perhaps I’m learning to compromise or settle or something – and that doesn’t feel great. When I think about it too hard, I still fiercely crave fucking and the essence of carnality, but I crave it within a larger context of varied sexual experiences and relationship structures. I “just” have to deconstruct that desire a bit (or a lot) and then put it all back together.
Posted by Dacia at July 19, 2005 04:50 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.wakingvixen.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/348
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Meanings and doings:
» spanking videos from Jane
free incest stories masturbation stories milf sex fat pornfat porn<... [Read More]
Tracked on April 22, 2006 03:39 AM
» nude secretary from Jane
piercings genital piercings CFNM Sample sex in office... [Read More]
Tracked on April 24, 2006 01:56 AM
» Payday Loan from Payday Loan
Payday Loan Payday Loans, Cash Loans [Read More]
Tracked on April 25, 2006 04:24 PM
Comments
Great post. I’m sure people will come along and try to deconstruct your every word, but fuck ‘em (or don’t, actually). Sexuality, in all its shapes and forms, is uniquely complex (there’s your cliche of the day), and the things you are talking about here are really fucking hard to articulate. Usually I get exasperated and give up because I just can’t get it right, no matter how many words I pick out of my thesaurus.
In other news, regarding this rhetorical question: “Have I fucked and smarted myself out of viable partners?” - the other night, my friend and partner in awesome fucking said, “I think I fucked myself stupid.” Good stuff.
Jesus, I said ‘fuck’ a lot in this comment.
Posted by: Belle at July 19, 2005 06:19 PM
Sounds like you’ve got more than just academic smarts there, Dacia. I think your instinct to explore intimacy resonates with a lot of your other entries of late and makes a lot of sense. I’m not sure how much- or even if- sex and intimacy are universally intertwined for humans, but there’s certainly a lot of distinction between the two; they have their own complexities that warrant serious contemplation.
Oh, and I also wanted to say fuckity-fuck McFuckles fuck fuckeroo. Just because Belle’s sounded like a lot of fun. :)
Posted by: Vince at July 19, 2005 07:07 PM
It was been very interesting for me to read you questioning your sexual choices, as I am doing the same in my life BUT in the opposite direction! I have led a life of great but 100% partnered sex. Its a wonderful feeling to make love to the women you have such feelings for. Slow, sweet cuddly sex. Touch heavy sex, kissing licking, smelling, fucking her mind and soul as much or more then her G-spot or clit. But there are times as a man when you just want to fuck somebodies brains out hard and fast, without feeling anything but good. Finding myself single again, I am thinking about exploring a more active multi partnered life. So I think its all about balance. And I guess the grass is always greener!
I hope you find the middle path for yourself!
Posted by: Jeff at July 19, 2005 08:16 PM
I have been away exploring also.
Not to sound weird, but lately I have been wondering what in the hell is wrong with me.
Caught somewhere between discontent and need. It is a strange time.
Posted by: Demon Queen at July 20, 2005 03:13 AM
I think everyone has to decide what they want in sex. The details are unique to the person seeking the answers. “Have I fucked and smarted myself out of partners?” No you haven’t, you just are not satisfyied with the details of those relationships. Something may have been missing ( love, intimid contact, trust, who knows?) or maybe you found what you were looking for and it was not as satisfying as you thought it would be. Being content with what you need is a hard eqaution to fill. Finding answers is hard because most of the search is in you. Remember the two obs of research, objectivity and observation. Project back to the times that were most satisfying to you and objectivly ask why. I have moved in a different direction than most, instead of different partners and multiple partners, I found sex with a committed partner to be incredibly satisfying. The reason I settled on was the regularity of the sex. I was never big on the game of hooking up, I found that to work against my nature. Once I figured out what I like about women, whats really hot to me, I worked my ass off to secure that sex for me. It worked and still works for me. Do I miss the late night calls and small orgies, not really, the only time i revisit those memories is during masterbation. After about 2 years of fucking what I could, i took a break to re-evaluate myself. The break lasted 3 and half years. After the break, I fell into old habits with some of the same people and just did not have the taste for it, this does not imply i did not enjoy myself because at those moments I would not have wanted to be anywhere else. Ultimatly I discovered that what I had to give was a lot better than most could give and I did not want to share the goods. Whoever was going to get the ass shaking orgasims was going to have to prove they could give as well as receive. Greedy? Arrogant? I dont know. But I do know I like the way things turned out.
Posted by: nh carey jr at July 20, 2005 10:54 AM
Damn you’re good NH, a methodology for looking into oneself and determining what is going on. I have admired your strength of character before, but I truely do take my hat off to you.
Most people need some help because they tend to misperceive their envirnment to some extent. Reaching that objectivity is very difficult, but it is achievable. Most psychologists couldn’t do it, claiming “am I not a psychological person!” I am not surprised that a historian could do it. Historians provided that priceless insight of “adapt or become extinct” that has served me well, so thank you for that insight.
NH, “Whoever was going to get the ass shaking orgasims was going to have to prove they could give as well as receive” is fine and dandy. What if that were someone like me who didn’t know how to give back an ass shaking orgasm? Try teaching first, you may have a very willing student. And the world can always use another capable of giving ass shaking orgasms. Self of itself is insufficient. When you have learned from your research, publish and teach it! That’s how we leave the campground a better place to be.
Dacia, I think you have a tough struggle that most of us go through more than once in our lives, and I wish you the best, I am sure you will come out of it stronger and more directed than ever before. Keep struggling, and thank you.
Monty
Posted by: Monty Parker at July 20, 2005 01:23 PM
That was a great explanation. Thanks for sharing all of those thoughts and feelings.
It sounds like you’re exploring the teritory between intimacy, autonomy, sexuality and haivng sex. I’m honored that you’re choosing to share those explorations with us, and I hope they lead you to great places.
Perhaps once you get back to NY (I think you’re coming back, right?) You could explore some Eulenspiegel Society events, or possibly hang out with Columbia’s BDSM group, Conversio Virium.
I’m also facinated that you found the sex at Jefferson’s grounding. I’ve been in a similar situation, ahving moved recently from a community that had regular paly parties among really close friends, some od whom I was romanticaly involved with, and others who were ‘tribe’ or ‘family’ (hey, why should you be the only one who gets to be a hippie? )
I don’t have that sort of group here in NY, and there’s a lot of turmoil going on around me. I miss the sense of community, but I still never saw the sex events in the same grounding way you seem to. They were so incredibly intense, and the sort of energy I get from partner-sex is not something I can get that often at sex parties.
On the other hand, I fell in love with my current partner at one of San Francisco’s largest kink/sex parties, so grounding-type intimacy at those events is possible for me, but that’s the exception to the rule.
In the spirit of sharing, I think I’d like to have about a 70/30 percent partnered to wild group sex ratio right now. I’m at 100% partnered/intimate sex, and the desire for the wildness is pretty strong.
One last suggestion: have you considered going to a Human Awareness Institute event? They’re pretty hippy-woo-woo, but they do seem to know what they’re doing in terms of aiding people in exploring intimacy.
Posted by: sinboy at July 20, 2005 01:49 PM
Why is it that people who like to come to others’ blogs and spout platitudes that are mainly applicable to their own life and no one else’s… why is it that these people typically cannot spell?
Posted by: Belle at July 20, 2005 02:45 PM
LOL Belle I was wondering the same thing!
Posted by: ember at July 20, 2005 02:56 PM
Uhhh…spelling errors aside Belle, I don’t get your point. In essence all blogs are ‘platitudes that are mainly applicable to their own lives’ (the ‘blogger’). So if we as the ‘bloggee’ want to respond in kind…everyones collective experiences make up the whole. (I don’t think I have any spelling errors here, heaven forbid).
Posted by: Bob at July 21, 2005 09:38 AM
Sorry Belle, I’m really just a bad typist and I can’t find the spelling checker to fix my typing errors. I also find it beyond my ability to respond from someone else’s frame of reference. What you see is all I have, and I’m sorry if it’s not enough for you.
Posted by: Monty Parker at July 21, 2005 12:34 PM
Gee, Belle, it would be of some use if you told us who was spouting platitudes, and what they were, instead of being all passive agressive.
Posted by: sinboy at July 21, 2005 06:33 PM
Oh, but that’s how I like it.
Posted by: Belle at July 22, 2005 10:41 AM
Don’t be so quick to discount platitudes just for the sake of being cool new and creative, if you’re looking for truth. Platitudes are old and boring cuz everyone agrees with them. That is, they’ve been found to be true by the vast majority of folks for a long fucking time.
Posted by: Carl, the old fart. at July 26, 2005 01:41 PM

